Friday, July 15, 2005

Oscar Pistorius

Oscar Pistorius, an 18 year old South African school kid set a record in 2004 Athens meet for 200m. What z the big deal you may ask, only that he doesnt have two legs (it was in 2004 Athens Paralympic meet) and he did 200m in 21.97 secs. He improved his previous timing of 24.8 secodns in March 2004 to 21.97 secs in September. He is the "fastest athelete with no legs" !! Pretty impressive uh?

Dont let Speilberg or Tom Cruise read this post 'cause they will be tempted to make an "emotional drama" out of it (yes you guessed it right I hate War of the Worlds).

It was not all that emotional in the article I read, it did not speak of the battles that Oscar had to go through in claiming this spot. It was oriented towards material science aspect of it, IEEE Spectrum guys gotta write that way ;) !



So much for his disabilities people have started questioning if he should be allowed to run in races? The prostheses he uses are made of carbon composites have amazing properties of variable stifness and strength which seem to be disadvantegous to other atheletes. Though the protheses returns only 95% of the energy exerted compared to 200% by our muscles authorities have already started questioning about the calculation of the energy and questioning if he should be allowed to compete with normal people.

To qualify in Olympics the lower range for an athelete in 200m category is 20.75 secs...The world record for the same is 19.32 secs. Will Oscar be able to improve his time from 21.97 to qualify, win or set a new world record? Time will answer that question.

But the bigger questions are
- Will he allowed to compete even if he wins?
- Is his disability an advantage? (Ironical? or rather oxymoronic..."advantageous disability" ;) )..


What do you guys think? Should he be allowed to compete with normal atheletes?

7 Comment:

At 9:51 AM, Blogger pk said...

Good question but, very tough to answer. We are always told to treat them like regular normal people, thats what they want too. So if letting them compete in regular catogary is a step towards it then why not. Most of the time they have more mental strength and josh to thrive than we do. Final boils down to the individual, Is he/she up to it?

 
At 2:38 PM, Blogger Phoenix said...

Kal,
I too feel likewise, society is oriented towards supporting people with disability to the extent that they dont feel disability anylonger and if particpating in sports is one such way we must welcome that...

But also when it comes to sports there should'nt be any "unfair" disadvantage to participants....

It all depends where we draw the line between those two...

THanks for sharing your thoughts :)

 
At 12:08 AM, Blogger Pal said...

Inspiring one this Oscar is. Good Post Phoenix

 
At 1:27 PM, Blogger Phoenix said...

Pal,
Thanks

Ansh,
I agree with you on inpiration part of it...but I would disagree on the Olympics stuff by you...Olympics or any game for that matter the spirit should be to be your best (aim for a win)...

Considering the quality of players that go for olympics it 'maybe' right to say that have already won by participating...and still their aim should be to win a medal in the current competition....

 
At 8:40 PM, Blogger Monicaatje said...

I'm almost asleep here so I¡m not even gonna try to answer the Q. I liked the post but i hate the world normal...
That's all (sorry, I really am almost asleep)

 
At 7:10 AM, Blogger Phoenix said...

Mon
I was trying to make a distinction between paralympics and olympics....did not know else to put it when I wrote it !

 
At 11:39 AM, Blogger Monicaatje said...

Know what u mean, I myself have problems many times looking for a word that's better than "normal" and that expresses what i want to say...
And what I meant to say was that I hate the word normal, not the world (although at times that can be discussed :P).
See? I was almost asleep.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home